Rule 1: General rules
This includes- footnotes, initial and subsequent references, quotations, punctuation, grammar and spelling.
Rule 1.1.6-1.1.7: Pinpoint references
Pinpoint references may include
Rules 1.4.1-1.4.3: Subsequent references and ibid
Subsequent references & short title
Rule 1.4.4: Short titles
Rule 2.1.14: Shortened and popular case names and subsequent references
Subsequent footnotes not immediately following the first citation of a case, should use the short title and refer back to the initial case footnote (n...) (see full explanation in AGLC4).
(Note: previous editions of AGLC did not permit subsequent references to cases.).
Rule 2.2.2: Law Report series
Authorised version to be used in preference to other case citations.
Rule 2.2.7: Parallel citations
Parallel citations should not be used except for UK cases (Rule 24).
Reported cases
Parties/Case Name (Year) Volume Number +Series Abbreviation + Starting page.
Parties names Rule 2
Dates and brackets
Series abbreviations
Page numbers
For more information read
Medium neutral case
Parties/Case Name [Year] Unique Court Identifier + Judgment Number.
Parties names Rule 2:
Court identifiers
Judgment number
Paragraph numbers
Rule 2.3.2:
Medium neutral
AGLC does not discriminate or identify a documents' format (medium or media).
In relation to cases medium neutral cases include references to paragraph numbers not to page numbers. The paragraph number remains the same no matter what format (print or online) you use or where you found the case.
In this case, use either quoting, quoted in, citing or cited in and discussed, discussed in as outlined in the rules in AGLC4 Rule 1.3.
These phrases should be proceeded by a coma.
Only cite the source that you have accessed in the bibliography, not the secondary citation.
Rule 2.2.1: Year and volume
Volumes of law report series are organised either by year or by volume number
Where the volumes are organised by volume number, the year in which the decision was handed down (often, but not necessarily, the year in which the case was reported) should appear in parentheses '( )'.
First footnote
56. R v Lester (2008) 190 A Crim R 468.
Subsequent footnotes
57. Ibid 469.
58. Sent v Andrews (2002) 6 VR 317.
Not:...(2002-03) 6 VR 317.
59. King v King [1974] Qd R 253.
60. McCartney v Lemon [1976] 2 NSWLR 72.
Bibliography
R v Lester (2008) 190 A Crim R 468
Sent v Andrews (2002) 6 VR 317
King v King [1974] Qd R 253
McCartney v Lemon [1976] 2 NSWLR 72
Rules 2.1.14 & 1.4.4:
If the parties names are fully cited in text you do not need to include the parties in the footnotes.
If a case is cited several times you should include the short title in your initial reference.
Citations immediately following the first can use Ibid, but later citations must include the short title and citation.
In-text
In Williams v Commonwealth 3 the High Court discussed the meaning of ‘benefits to students’ in the context of services provided by….
First footnote
3. (2014) 88 ALJR 701, 710 [38].
Subsequent footnotes
4. Ibid 711 [45].
Bibliography
Williams v Commonwealth 88 ALJR 701
Williams v Commonwealth 88 ALJR 711
Rule 2.3.1: Decisions with a medium neutral citation
Previous editions of AGLC required a full date as part of the citation. This is no longer required.
First footnote
1. Quarmby v Keating [2009] TASCC 80, [11].
Subsequent footnotes
2. Ibid 1 20.
3. Catharine MacMillan, Mistakes in Contract Law (Hart Publishing, 2010) 9.
Bibliography
Quamby v Keating [2009] TASCC 80
MacMillan, Catharine, Mistakes in Contract Law (Hart Publishing, 2010)
Rule 2.3.2: Decisions without a medium neutral citation
Previous editions of AGLC required the word 'unreported' within the citation. This is no longer required.
Older unreported judgments are sometimes compiled by courts into bound volumes.
Even when citing an unreported case from such a volume, there is no need to refer to the volume or to include a starting page.
In accordance with Rule 2.2.2, a case should generally not be cited as unreported if it has been reported.
First footnote
2. Barton v Chibber (Supreme Court of Victoria, Hampel J. 29 June 1989) 3.
Bibliography
Barton v Chibber (Supreme Court of Victoria, Hampel J, 29 June 1989) 3
Rule 2.7.1: Transcripts of proceedings
Transcripts of proceedings should be cited as follows:
Transcript of Proceedings, Case Name (Court, Proceeding Number, Judicial Officer(s), Full Date of Proceedings) Pinpoint
Proceeding number should be included only if on transcript.
Names of all judicial officers hearing the matter should be included after the proceeding number.
First footnote
116. Transcript of Proceedings, North East Solution Pty Ltd V Masters Home Improvement Australia Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of Victoria, Croft J, 18 May 2015) 31 (PJ Bick QC).
Bibliography
Transcript of Proceedings, North East Solution Pty Ltd V Masters Home Improvement Australia Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of Victoria, Croft J, 18 May 2015)
Canada
Rule 15:
Canadian cases should be sited in accordance with Chapter 2.
First footnote
1. R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45.
R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45
New Zealand
Rule 21:
New Zealand cases should be sited in accordance with Chapter 2.
First footnote
1. Haylock v Pateck [2009] 1 NZLR 351.
Bibliography
Haylock v Pateck [2009] 1 NZLR 351
United Kingdom
Rule 24:
United Kingdom cases should be sited in accordance with Chapter 2.
'Public Limited Company' should be abbreviated 'plc' in parties' names.
First footnote
1. CAS (Nominees) Ltd v Nottingham Forest plc [2001] 1 ALL ER 954.
Bibliography
CAS (Nominees) Ltd v Nottingham Forest plc [2001] 1 ALL ER 954
United States of America
Rule 25:
United States cases should be cited Parties' Names, Volume Report Series and Series Number Starting Page, Pinpoint Jurisdiction and Court Name Year.
Parties' names should adhere to rule 2.1. However they should be followed by a (non-italic) coma.
Commas within company names before 'Inc', 'Corp' and other words indicating incorporation should omitted.
First footnote
1. Roper v Simmons, 543 US 551, 567 (2005).
2. Zapatha v Dairy Mart Inc, 381 Mass 284, 289 (Mass,1980).
Not: Zapatha v Dairy Mart, Inc,...
Bibliography
Roper v Simmons, 543 US 551, 567 (2005).
Zapatha v Dairy Mart Inc, 381 Mass 284,289.
International Court of Justice Reported Decisions
Rule 10.2:
Case Name (Nations) (Phase [Year] Report Series and Series Letters, Starting Page and Case Number, Pinpoint.
Bibliography
Maritime Dispute (Peru v Chile) (Judgment) [2014] ICJ Rep 3.
International Court of Justice Unreported Materials
Rule 10.4.1:
Case Name (Nations) (Phase) (International Court of Justice, General List No Number, Full Date [Pinpoint].
First footnote
30. Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ( Djibouti v France) (Judgment) (International Court of Justice, General List No 136, 4 June 2008).
Bibliography
Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ( Djibouti v France) (Judgment) (International Court of Justice, General List No 136, 4 June 2008).
Rule 12: International Criminal Tribunals and Courts
See AGLC Page 176.
Rule 14: Supranational Materials
See AGLC Page 193
Rule 14.2: European Union Materials
See AGLC Page 194
Rule 14.2.2: Constitutive treaties of the European Union
See AGLC Page 196
Rule 14.2.3: Courts of the European Union
See AGLC Page 199
Rule 14.3.1: Basic Documents of the Council of Europe
See AGLC Page 201
Rule 14.3.2: European Court of Human Rights
See AGLC Page 202
Rule 14.3.3: European Commission on Human Rights
See AGLC Page 204
Rule 14.4: Other Supranational Courts and Tribunals
See AGLC Page 205
Copyright © 2024 The University of Notre Dame Australia | CRICOS Provider Code: 01032F | TEQSA PRV12170 | RTO Code 0064